AIM Controls LLC v. USF Reddaway Inc
AIM Controls LLC |
USF Reddaway Inc |
4:2008cv01662 |
May 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Contract: Other Office |
Harris |
Keith P Ellison |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Limiting Damages as a Matter of Law.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(svaught) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AIM Controls LLC v. USF Reddaway Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AIM Controls LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USF Reddaway Inc | |
Represented By: | Eric R Benton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.