Garcia v. Shell Oil Company et al
| Sherrylene Garcia |
| Shell Oil Company and Gustavo Penilla |
| 4:2008cv01734 |
| May 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Harris |
| Nancy K. Johnson |
| Gray H. Miller |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION grants 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant Shell Oil Company,denies 34 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Evidence, grants 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson) Parties notified.(lgonzales, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING in Part 11 Memorandum and Recommendations DENYING 9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Gustavo Penilla and DENYING 5 MOTION to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2008: # 1 Order) (rkonieczny).
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Gustavo Penilla, 5 MOTION to Dismiss and, subject thereto, Original Answer and Affirmative Defenses and Other Defenses, 10 MOTION for Protective Order Objections to M&R due by 10/6/2008.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson) Parties notified.(lgonzales, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
