Ridha et al v. Texas A&M University System et al
| Saeeda Ali Muhsen and Mundhir T Ridha |
| Charles Long, Mark Westhusin, Christy Bormann, Duane Kraemer, H Richard Adams, Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System and Texas AgriLife Research |
| 4:2008cv02814 |
| September 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Brazos |
| Nancy F. Atlas |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART 27 Second MOTION to Dismiss.(SORDERED that Defendants Second Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleading Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) is [Doc. # 27] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Texas A&M University System is DISMISSED; if Plaintiffs wish to file amended pleadings against Texas A&M University System, they must do so on or before May 29, 2009. All Section 1983 claims brought against the University Defendants, or against Individual Defendants in their official capacities, are DISMISSED. Section 1981 claims that are not based upon race are DISMISSED. igned by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
