Giamalva v. Quarterman
Petitioner: Cary Evan Giamalva
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Case Number: 4:2008cv03112
Filed: October 15, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Brazos
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support, denying as moot 24 MOTION Resentencing with Brief in Support, denying as moot 25 MOTION Waive Copy Requirements for Opposing Counsel. Giamalva has not met the requirements for issuing a COA.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(sjones, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giamalva v. Quarterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cary Evan Giamalva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?