Liu v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
May Liu |
Arrow Financial Services, LLC |
4:2008cv03116 |
October 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Consumer Credit Office |
Harris |
Melinda Harmon |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Notice of Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Liu v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: May Liu | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arrow Financial Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | William Keith Wier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.