Adams Offshore Limited v. OSA International, LLC et al
Adams Offshore Limited |
OSA International, LLC, Con-Dive, L.L.C., Amado Omar Yanez Osuna, Oceanografia, S.A. de C.V., Mindy Kay, MIndy K. McGilvrey, Gustavo Adolfo Azcarate Padilla, Daniela Tejada, Williams Field Services - Gulf Coast Company, LP and Discovery Producer Services, L.L.C. |
4:2009cv00465 |
February 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Contract: Marine Office |
Anderson |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1330 Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered based on settlement notification. Case terminated on 12/14/11.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 85 ORDER entered: Pending before this court is the summary-judgment defendants motion to withdraw deemed admissions. (Docket Entry No. 81). Adams Offshore Limited has not yet responded to that motion. The parties have informed the court that they hav e reached a tentative settlement. To accommodate the parties, Adams Offshore is granted an extension for filing its response. In the event that the parties do not settle, Adams Offshores response is due by 5:00 p.m. Central on October 24, 2011.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 48 ORDER entered MOOTING 45 MOTION to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.