Cantu et al v. Vitol, Inc.
Alma Cantu and Darlene Reed |
Vitol, Inc. |
4:2009cv00576 |
February 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Labor: Fair Standards Office |
Harris |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER entered: Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/22/2011. Docket Call set for 4/26/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 43 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER entered Striking Document re: 27 MOTION to Compel Defendant's Document Production for failure to comply with this court procedures regarding discovery. The court will address these issues at a scheduling conference already on this court's docket for 1/22/10 at 9:00 a.m.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered DENIED 14 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses, GRANTING 16 Opposed MOTION to Certify Class. A Scheduling Conference is set for 1/22/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.