Golden et al v. Austin County, Texas
| Michael Golden and Cathleen Golden |
| Austin County, Texas |
| 4:2009cv00817 |
| March 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Austin |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered based on settlement notification. Case terminated on 12/20/10.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER entered GRANTING 68 Unopposed AMENDED motion to reset scheduling conference. Scheduling Conference reset for 11/22/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 59 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss. A Scheduling Conference is set for 11/12/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 58 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Extended Brief and DENYING Pltfs. motion to strike.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER entered GRANTING 56 Unopposed AMENDED 55 MOTION EMERGENCY MOTION MOTION for Extension of Time Dispositive MotionsUnopposed AMENDED. Dispositive motions deadline extended to 10/19/09.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 43 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time Deadlines for Preliminary Discovery and Filing of Dispositive Motions, DENYING 47 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Mtn to Extend Deadlines.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER entered that the plaintiffs must file their response to the defendants motion to extend the deadlines by 9/11/09..(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER entered. The defendants have not presented any basis that would warrant granting a motion to dismiss. Based on the present record, their requests in their amended answer for dismissal with prejudice are denied. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered DENYING AS MOOT 14 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time Time to File Amended Complaint & Effectuate Service, GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 23 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss and, Subject Thereto, Answer Presenting Defenses Under Rule 12(b)Opposed MOTION to Dismiss and, Subject Thereto, Answer Presenting Defenses Under Rule 12(b), GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 2 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Austin County Sheriff's Department, R. DeWayn e Burger, Carolyn Bilski and unidentified "Arresting Officers" and, Subject Thereto, Answer Presenting Defenses under Rule 12(b)Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Austin County Sheriff's Department, R. DeWayne Burger, Carolyn Bilski and unidentified "Arresting Officers" and, Subject Thereto, Answer Presenting Defenses under Rule 12(b), DENYING AS MOOT 19 Supplemental MOTION for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service, GRANTING 10 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Co mplaint & Supp Response to Reply, GRANTING 29 MOTION for Entry of Order re:, DENYING 15 Opposed MOTION to Expedite Limited Discovery Response. Plaintiff may amend no later than July 6. 2009. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
