Astra Oil Trading NV et al v. Petrobras America Inc. et al
Astra Oil Trading NV, Astra GP Inc and Astra TradeCo LP LLC |
Petrobras America Inc., PAI PRSI Trading General LLC and PAI PRSI Trading Limited LLC |
4:2009cv01274 |
April 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Harris |
Ewing Werlein, Jr |
None |
9 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. 19 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.(Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 19 Motion to Dismiss; denying 38 Sealed Motion; granting 53 Sealed Motion. The Final Award of Arbitrators dated April 10, 2009, is in all things CONFIRMED; it is further ORDERED that Petitioners shall have and recov er from Respondents reasonable attorneys' fees and other court and direct costs incurred by them in connection with this confirmation action. Accordingly, within 7 days after the entry of this Order, Petitioners shall file their application for attorneys' fees and expenses, accompanied by the required documents as identified in the Court's order. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.