Hall et al v. Dixon et al
| Chanel Hall |
| Scott Dixon, LaSandra Smith, Tonya Clay and Texas Department of Family and Protective Services |
| 4:2009cv02611 |
| August 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING 67 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 124 Joint MOTION for Status Conference, GRANTING 109 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Response to Motion, GRANTING 65 MOTION to Dismiss, GRANTING 57 Opposed MOTI ON to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, GRANTING 55 MOTION Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and FAilure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. 12(c), GRANTING 56 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, DENYING AS MOOT 43 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) or Alternatively for More Definte Statement, GRANTING 40 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) , DENYING AS MOOT 46 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff;s Failure to State a Claim Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c) MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss f or Plaintiff;s Failure to State a Claim Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c), DENYING AS MOOT 125 Opposed MOTION to Compel Production, GRANTING 74 Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 68 MOTION to Dismiss 22 Amended Complaint /Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc.,, MOTION to Dismiss 22 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc.,,, DENYING AS MOOT 38 MOTION to Dismiss 8(d)(1) or Alternatively to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent Statements. A Status Conference is se t for 11/12/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. This court requests briefs of no more than 20 pages from Hall by October 20, 2010, stating whether she seeks leave to amend any of the federal-law claims against the remainin g defendants and, if not, whether remand is appropriate. The defendants may respond no later than November 10, 2010. At the November 12, 2010 status conference, these issues will be addressed..(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER entered DENYING 90 Opposed MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order as to 84 Discovery Hearing,,,,.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER entered MOOTING 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 72 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER entered GRANTING 37 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
