Forschler v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Forschler
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc. and Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C.
Case Number: 4:2009cv03839
Filed: November 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #12 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(dpalacios, )
August 10, 2010 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Caterpillar Inc., Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C., William Forschler, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/31/2010. (Riffe, G.)
February 26, 2010 Filing 11 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Caterpillar Inc., filed.(Croyle, Robert)
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER ( Amended Pleadings due by 5/24/2010, Joinder of Parties due by 5/24/2010, Pltf Expert Report due by 6/28/2010, Pltf Expert Witness List due by 6/28/2010, Deft Expert Report due by 8/23/2010, Deft Expert Witness List due by 8/23/2010, Discovery due by 11/22/2010, Mediation due by 12/21/2010, Dispositive Motion Filing due by 1/10/2011, Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/28/2011, Docket Call set for 3/7/2011 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 11A before Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt). The telephone scheduling conf. set for 2/22/10 is cancelled.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(dpalacios, )
February 19, 2010 Filing 9 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by William Forschler, filed.(Riffe, George)
February 19, 2010 Filing 8 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C., filed.(Pearson, Chris)
February 11, 2010 Filing 7 Agreed PROPOSED ORDER re: #6 JointDiscovery/Case Management Plan, filed.(Croyle, Robert)
February 11, 2010 Filing 6 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Caterpillar Inc., filed.(Croyle, Robert)
January 28, 2010 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by William Forschler, filed.(Riffe, George)
January 28, 2010 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C., filed.(Pearson, Chris)
January 26, 2010 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Caterpillar Inc., filed.(Croyle, Robert)
January 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2010 at 04:30 PM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(dpalacios, )
November 25, 2009 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 113th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2009-61548 (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0541-5747583) filed by Caterpillar Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Index of Documents Filed, #2 Exhibit B-1: Executed Process - Caterpillar Inc., #3 Exhibit B-2: Executed Process - Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C., #4 Exhibit B-3: Executed Process - Houston Freightliner, Inc., #5 Exhibit B-4: Plaintiff's Original Petition and Request for Disclosure, #6 Exhibit B-5: Defendant Caterpillar Inc.'s Original Answer and Special Exceptions to Plaintiff's Original Petition and Rule 194 Request for Disclosure, #7 Exhibit B-6: Defendant Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C.'s Original Answer to Plaintiff's Original Petition, #8 Exhibit B-7: Defendant Houston Freightliner's Motion to Transfer Venue and Original Answer, #9 Exhibit B-8: Defendant Caterpillar Inc.'s First Amended Original Answer and Special Exceptions to Plaintiff's Original Petition, #10 Exhibit B-9: Plaintiff's First Amended Petition and Request for Rule 194 Disclosures, #11 Exhibit B-10: Order Granting Motion to Transfer Venue, #12 Exhibit B-11: Order on Motion for Substitution of Counsel, #13 Exhibit B-12: Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Non-Suit Without Prejudice on Defendant Houston Freightliner, Inc. Only, #14 Exhibit B-13: Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Petition and Request for Rule 194 Disclosures, #15 Exhibit B-14: Docket Sheet - 113th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, #16 Exhibit B-15: Docket Sheet - Orders of the Court - 9th Judicial District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, #17 Exhibit C: Counsel List)(Croyle, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forschler v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc.
Represented By: Robert Terrell Croyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C.
Represented By: Chris Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Forschler
Represented By: G. Brad Riffe
Represented By: Richard Collins Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?