Maxxim Care EMS, Inc. v. Sebelius
Plaintiff: Maxxim Care EMS, Inc.
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Case Number: 4:2010cv01408
Filed: April 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Lynn N. Hughes
Presiding Judge: Stephen Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION denying 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment and granting 27 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendant.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm Smith) Parties notified. (jmarchand)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxxim Care EMS, Inc. v. Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maxxim Care EMS, Inc.
Represented By: Lurese A Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?