Jones et al v. Houston Community College et al
| Kimberly Mason and Alfreda Jones |
| Houston Community College, Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership, Timothy Rychlec, Kratos Texas, Inc., Kratos Defense and Security Solutions, Inc. and Gloria J. Walker |
| 4:2010cv02356 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 8/20/12.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered MOOTING 93 MOTION to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Testimony, GRANTING 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 70 Corrected MOTION for Summary Judgment. The defendants motions for summary judgment are granted. All claims except the state-law invasion of privacy claim against Aramark are dismissed, with prejudice. No later than August 13, 2012, Jones must inform the court what additional evidence, if any, she has that Aramark intruded upon her seclusion that would preclude summary judgment as to that claim. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
