Emmett v. Williams et al
Barry Emmett |
Betty Williams, Esleen Kennedy, Shanta Crawford, Brad Livington and U.T.M.B. Texas Tech Executive Medical Director |
4:2010cv03610 |
October 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Walker |
Melinda Harmon |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 OPINION ON DISMISSAL granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against defendants Dr. Betty Williams, Shanta Crawford and Dr. Denise DeShields are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims against all other defendants in this case are DISMISSE D as legally frivolous; denying as moot 87 Motion to Strike; denying 88 Motion for Leave to File; denying 88 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 96 Motion to Amend; denying as moot 97 Motion for Leave to File; deny ing as moot 98 Motion to Appoint ; denying as moot 103 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 104 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 106 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 111 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 118 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 119 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 122 Motion; denying as moot 129 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff's state law claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. All other pending motions are DENIED, AS MOOT. This complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.