Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney
| Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc |
| Jason John Cooney |
| 4:2010cv05081 |
| December 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. Case terminated on 5/25/11.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, filed.(Pyke, Alexander) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(aalonzo, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(aalonzo, )
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jason John Cooney, filed.(arrivera ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Monica Littman to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/26/2011. (Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Jason Murtagh to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/26/2011. (Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #2 Order for Initial Conference and Disclosure, by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, filed.(Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, filed.(Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 3 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Jason John Cooney served on 12/20/2010, answer due 1/10/2011, filed.(Temple, Mark) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/27/2011 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(mmapps, )
|
| Summons Issued as to Jason John Cooney, filed.(jdav, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jason John Cooney (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0541-7444346) filed by Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Nicholas Pyke |
| Represented By: | Jason E Murtagh |
| Represented By: | Monica M. Littman |
| Represented By: | Mark D Temple |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jason John Cooney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
