Tricon Energy Ltd v. Vinmar International Ltd
| Tricon Energy Ltd |
| Vinmar International Ltd |
| Vinmar International Ltd |
| Tricon Energy Ltd |
| 4:2010cv05260 |
| December 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered DENYING 63 MOTION to Strike MOTION to Strike or, in the Alternative, Response to Tricon's Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees, DENYING 60 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER entered DENYING 61 MOTION to Enforce to Stay Enforcement of Judgment as to 57 Proposed Order. Vinmars motion to stay execution of the final judgment under Rules 62(b) and 62(d) is denied. As stated above, this ruling is without prejudice to Vinmar reurging its Rule 62(d) motion once a notice of appeal is filed. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Tricon is entitled to postjudgment interest at the federal statutory rate. By January 23, 2012, the parties must submit a proposed order confirming the arbitral award and entering final judgment in this case.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER entered: This court concludes that no further briefing is necessary to address Vinmars seven grounds for vacating the arbitral award and denies Vinmars request to vacate the award based on those grounds. By October 21, 2011, the parties must submit a proposed order confirming the award and entering final judgment in this case. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 16 MOTION to Vacate. Vinmars motion to remand this proceeding and motion to vacate the arbitral award are denied. This court must confirm Tricons arbitral award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferra l of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the [New York] Convention. 9 U.S.C. § 207. The Convention lists seven grounds for refusing to enforce an arbitral award. See Admart AG v. Stephen and Mary Birch Found., Inc., 457 F.3d 302, 30708 (3d Cir. 2006) (listing the seven grounds). By September 28, 2011, Vinmar must inform this court whether any of these grounds apply in this case and, if so, propose a schedule for raising and resolving them.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
