Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foxconn Corporation et al
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Foxconn Corporation, Foxconn Assembly, L.L.C. and Q-Hub Logistics Corporation |
| 4:2010mc00363 |
| August 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. The parties have informed the Court that this matter is now moot. Accordingly, the Court hereby CLOSED the case. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aalonzo)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION re: Continuation to the Application for an Order to Show Cause Until After October 15, 2010 by Foxconn Assembly, L.L.C., Foxconn Corporation, Q-Hub Logistics Corporation, filed.(Staley, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James R. Staley on behalf of Foxconn Assembly, L.L.C., Foxconn Corporation, Q-Hub Logistics Corporation, filed. (Staley, James) |
| Filing 1 Application to Enforce Administrative Subpoenas/Other Miscellaneous Relief filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Memo in Support, # 2 Exhibit A, A-1 to A-8, and B, # 3 Proposed Order Show Cause, # 4 Proposed Order Granting Relief)(Wilhite, Connie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
