Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Rodriguez et al
| Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers Vacation Fund, Trustees of The Texas Iron Workers' Health Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Texas Iron Workers Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and Trustees of the Texas Iron Workers and Employers Apprenticeship Training and Journeyman Upgrading Fund |
| Richard's Rebar Placing, Inc. and Richard V Rodriguez |
| 4:2011cv00243 |
| January 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Melinda Harmon |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Unopposed MOTION for James D. Rosenblatt and P. Weston May to Withdraw as Attorney, Attorney Paul Weston May and James D Rosenblatt terminated. The Rosenblatt Law Firm's mtn to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. Richard Rodrig uez may proceed pro se in his individual capacity but must obtain counsel to represent corporate defendant Richard's Rebar Placing Inc. New counsel must appear within 30 days or the corporations pleadings will be stricken from the record and pltfs may file a mtn for default judgment. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
