Taylor et al v. TESCO Corporation (US)
Keith Taylor and Barbara Taylor |
Tesco Corporation (US), Pride International, Inc., Mexico Drilling Limited, LLC and Tesco Corporation |
Mexico Drilling Limited, LLC and Pride International, Inc. |
Illinois National Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Zurich Insurance Company and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania |
Pride International, Inc. and Mexico Drilling Limited, LLC |
Tesco Corporation (US) and Tesco Corporation |
4:2011cv00517 |
February 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Ewing Werlein |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 340 ORDER denying 333 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, 4) |
Filing 332 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 309 MOTION for Summary Judgment, denying 308 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and denying 307 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Filing 321 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on 306 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Fourth Supplemental and Amended Complaint, 305 MOTION to Strike 301 Answer to Third Party Complaint to Crossclaim MOTION to Strike 301 Answer to Third Party Complaint to Crossclaim, 230 MOTION to Dismiss Based on Forum Non Conveniens, 232 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Choice of Law (Fact Discovery due by 3/15/2013, Dispositive Motion Filing due by 4/1/2013, Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/15/2013, Docket Call set for 6/7/2013 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 11D before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr)Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Filing 293 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 201 MOTION to Sever Steadfast Insurance Company and Zurich Insurance Company and Insurance Claims, denying without prejudice 189 MOTION to Dismiss. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Filing 188 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER the 154 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice is GRANTED with respect to Defendant Tesco Corporation simply as a memorial of Plaintiffs dismissal without prejudice of Tesco Corporation, which was effective on March 18, 201 1, when the motion was filed; the motion is GRANTED with respect to Tesco Corporation (US) for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum; and the motion is otherwise DENIED. The 185 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Fourth Supplemental and Am ending Complaint is GRANTED, subject, however, to the Order set forth granting Plaintiffs dismissals of their claims against Tesco Corporation and Tesco US, without prejudice. The 57 Motion to Dismiss Tesco Corporation Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 2 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants Pride International, Inc. and Mexico Drilling, LLCs 46 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on Basis of Prescription is DENIED, but without prejudice to the motion timely being reasserted on their claimed defense of prescription if at a future time it is adjudicated that Tesco US is not a joint tortfeasor with the Pride Defendants.(Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.