Slipchenko v. Brunel Energy, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Tamara Slipchenko
Defendant: Brunel Energy, Inc. and Brunel Energy Group Health Plan
Case Number: 4:2011cv01465
Filed: April 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER entered GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 186 MOTION for Approval of Residual Settlement Funds. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 183 ORDER entered: In light of the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Final Approval entered January 23, 2015, the parties are directed to submit any additional orders appropriate to maintain the schedule for fully implementing the settlement agreement. The proposed orders are due by February 2, 2015. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER entered GRANTING 155 MOTION for Approval of Class Action Settlement (Preliminary). Preliminary Approval/Fairness Hearing set for 1/20/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 54 MOTION to Certify Class, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment. A Status Conference is set for 9/16/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 76 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas to Non-Parties Kaiser Permanente, VA San Diego Healthcare System, Hologic Gen-Probe, Inc. and Arthur D. Little, Inc. (and to Compel Defendants to Comply with Discovery Order). (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 50 MOTION to Amend 36 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slipchenko v. Brunel Energy, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Slipchenko
Represented By: Justin M Campbell, III
Represented By: Karen Handorf
Represented By: Marc I Machiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brunel Energy, Inc.
Represented By: Jay R Aldis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brunel Energy Group Health Plan
Represented By: Jay R Aldis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?