Rangel v. Thaler
Petitioner: Otoniel Rangel
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 4:2011cv01614
Filed: April 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Potter
Presiding Judge: Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION ON DISMISSAL granting 12 Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 13 Petitioner's Motion Opposing a Summary Judgment. Petitioner's petition for habeas relief is DENIED; A certificate of appealaability is DENIED; All other pending motions, if any, are DENIED. This habeas action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE..(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rangel v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Otoniel Rangel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?