Raw Films, LTD v. Doe Featured Case
Plaintiff: Raw Films, LTD
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 4:2011cv03123
Filed: August 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Fort Bend
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2011 Filing 2 STATEMENT of Disclosure Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by Raw Films, LTD, filed.(Martin, Lionel)
August 25, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0541-8503561) filed by Raw Films, LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Lionel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raw Films, LTD v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raw Films, LTD
Represented By: Lionel Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?