Higgins v. Thaler
Plaintiff: Lawrence Higgins
Defendant: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 4:2012cv02899
Filed: September 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Walker
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment. 1 Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(glyons, 4)
September 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(glyons, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Higgins v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?