Fryar v. Viacom, Inc. et al.
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Fryar
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Viacom, Inc.
Case Number:
4:2012cv03713
Filed:
December 21, 2012
Court:
Texas Southern District Court
Office:
Houston Office
County:
Harris
Presiding Judge:
Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit:
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Docket Report
We have record of the following docket entries for this case:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
February 5, 2013 | 6 |
![]() |
January 30, 2013 | 5 | Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending Outcome of MDL Motion by Stephanie Fryar, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/20/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Voyles, Adam) |
January 8, 2013 | 4 | CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Stephanie Fryar, filed.(Voyles, Adam) |
January 2, 2013 | 3 | AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Plaintiffs filed by Stephanie Fryar.(Voyles, Adam) |
December 24, 2012 | Summons Issued as to Viacom, Inc., filed. (wbostic) | |
December 24, 2012 | Summons Issued as to Google, Inc., filed. (wbostic) | |
December 24, 2012 | 2 |
![]() |
December 21, 2012 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Stephanie Fryar (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0541-10769161) filed by Stephanie Fryar. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons- Viacom Inc., # 3 Summons-Google Inc.)(Voyles, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.