Golden v. Yellobook, Inc.
| Christine Golden |
| Yellowbook, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv00064 |
| January 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 1/27/14.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ENTERED: After a thorough review of the pleadings, Yellowbook's motion for summary judgment, Golden's response, Yellowbooks reply, the summary-judgment record, and the relevant law, the court orders Yellowbook to supplement its motion for summary judgment to consider the application of Austin v. Kroger Texas L.P., F.3d, 2013 WL 5420317 (5th. Cir. Sept. 27, 2013) and Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762, 76364, 763 n.37 (Tex. 2010) to the facts of this case. Yellowbo ok should take special care to note the distinction between independent contractors and employees of independent contractors under Texas law. Yellowbooks supplemental briefing cannot exceed 5 pages and must be filed by October 28, 2013. Golden may submit a 5-page response to that supplement by November 4, 2013. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER enterted DENYING 15 MOTION for Nonsuit . (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER entered: The plaintiff has filed a notice of nonsuit without prejudice. (Docket Entry No. 15). Under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, such a notice serves as a basis for dismissing without prejudice and without a court ord er only if no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed. In this case, the defendant moved for summary judgment. No later than October 11, 2013, the plaintiff must show cause why either: (1) the dismissal should not be granted with prejudice; or (2) the stipulation should not be withdrawn and the motion for summary judgment ruled on after the time for response has expired.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Golden v. Yellobook, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Yellowbook, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tarush R Anand |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christine Golden | |
| Represented By: | Eric B. Dick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
