Parrott Jr. v. Thaler

Parrott Jr. v. Thaler

Petitioner:	Jimmie Mark Parrott Jr.
Respondent:	Rick Thaler
Case Number:	4:2013cv01052
Filed:	April 10, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office:	Houston Office
County:	Harris
Presiding Judge:	Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 30, 2017	Filing 113 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All other pending motions, if any, are DENIED (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
March 2, 2015	Filing 64 ORDER STAYING CASE denying 56 MOTION to Expedite Disposition of Case, 54 MOTION to Expedite Consideration, 60 MOTION to Expedite Ruling, 37 MOTION to Expedite 3333, 55 MOTION to Compel the Court to enter an Opinion and final judgm ent. The Parties shall file supplemental briefs within thirty (30) days of this order directly addressing the legal issues identified above. The parties should also address whether oral argument would be beneficial in this case and whether appointme nt of counsel for Petitioner is warranted. This case is STAYED pending the additional briefing described above and resolution of the mandamus petition recently filed by Petitioner. (DocketNo. 61.). The Clerk of Court will send a copy of this Order to the parties and to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins, 4)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 30, 2017

Filing 113 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All other pending motions, if any, are DENIED (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)

March 2, 2015

Filing 64 ORDER STAYING CASE denying 56 MOTION to Expedite Disposition of Case, 54 MOTION to Expedite Consideration, 60 MOTION to Expedite Ruling, 37 MOTION to Expedite 3333, 55 MOTION to Compel the Court to enter an Opinion and final judgm ent. The Parties shall file supplemental briefs within thirty (30) days of this order directly addressing the legal issues identified above. The parties should also address whether oral argument would be beneficial in this case and whether appointme nt of counsel for Petitioner is warranted. This case is STAYED pending the additional briefing described above and resolution of the mandamus petition recently filed by Petitioner. (DocketNo. 61.). The Clerk of Court will send a copy of this Order to the parties and to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parrott Jr. v. Thaler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmie Mark Parrott Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?