Ghannoum v. Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C.
Plaintiff: Michael Ghannoum
Defendant: Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C.
Case Number: 4:2013cv02994
Filed: October 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Ewing Werlein
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Conditionally Granting 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens and Brief in Support. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghannoum v. Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C.
Represented By: Stephen Cass Weiland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Ghannoum
Represented By: Harron Hafati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?