Anderson

Appellant: Wanda Sheffield Anderson
Case Number: 4:2014cv00757
Filed: March 25, 2014
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Austin
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 4, 2015 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER entered GRANTING 19 Agreed MOTION to Abate, DENYING 15 Opposed MOTION to Alter JudgmentOpposed MOTION to Modify JudgmentOpposed MOTION for ReconsiderationOpposed MOTION for Rehearing of Judgment. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
August 5, 2015 14 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The bankruptcy courts order of March 7, 2014 is reversed in part. This case is remanded to the bankruptcy court to reassess the value of the first lien on Brundages property in light of the foregoing. Case terminated on 8/5/15.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Wanda Sheffield Anderson
Represented By: Matthew Dudley Cavenaugh(Designation Retained)
Represented By: John A Koepke(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?