Anderson
Wanda Sheffield Anderson |
4:2014cv00757 |
March 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Austin |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Appeal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER entered GRANTING 19 Agreed MOTION to Abate, DENYING 15 Opposed MOTION to Alter JudgmentOpposed MOTION to Modify JudgmentOpposed MOTION for ReconsiderationOpposed MOTION for Rehearing of Judgment. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The bankruptcy courts order of March 7, 2014 is reversed in part. This case is remanded to the bankruptcy court to reassess the value of the first lien on Brundages property in light of the foregoing. Case terminated on 8/5/15.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anderson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Wanda Sheffield Anderson | |
Represented By: | Matthew Dudley Cavenaugh |
Represented By: | John A Koepke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.