Romano Woods Dialysis Center v. Admiral Linen Service, Inc. et al
| Romano Woods Dialysis Center |
| Admiral Linen Service, Inc., Group & Pension Administrators, Inc. and The PHIA Group, L.L.C. |
| 4:2014cv01125 |
| April 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Nancy F. Atlas |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 51] isGRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 53] is DENIED.It is furtherORDERED that Defendants shall file any motion for attorneys fees pursuantto 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1), with supporting documentation ( motion for attorneys' fees due by 7/24/2015., Responses due by 8/17/2015., Replies due by 8/24/2015)(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Take Judicial Notice [Doc. # 49] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified. (sashabranner, 4)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Motions to Dismiss [10, 12] as to "Breach of Fiduciary Duties" and "Interference" claims and denying Motions as to "Denial of Benefits" claim.(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(TDR, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
