SL Pathology Leasing of Texas LLC d/b/a Sightline Pathology v. Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: SL Pathology Leasing of Texas LLC d/b/a Sightline Pathology
Defendant: Miraca Life Sciences, Inc., Water Street Healthcare Partners, LLC, Lakewood Pathology Associates, Inc. d/b/a Plus Diagnostics and David Pauluzzi
Case Number: 4:2014cv03724
Filed: December 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Nancy F. Atlas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the 270th Judicial District Courtof Harris County, Texas. (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 16 Opposed MOTION to Abate ( Responses due by 2/20/2015., Replies due by 2/27/2015)(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4) (Main Document 20 replaced on 2/17/2015) (sashabranner, 4). (Main Document 20 replaced on 2/17/2015) (sashabranner, 4).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SL Pathology Leasing of Texas LLC d/b/a Sightline Pathology v. Miraca Life Sciences, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SL Pathology Leasing of Texas LLC d/b/a Sightline Pathology
Represented By: Anthony Fields Montgomery
Represented By: Jeffrey H Uzick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miraca Life Sciences, Inc.
Represented By: Walter Moreau Berger
Represented By: Jeffrey J Huelskamp
Represented By: William C O'Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Water Street Healthcare Partners, LLC
Represented By: Walter Moreau Berger
Represented By: Jeffrey J Huelskamp
Represented By: William C O'Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lakewood Pathology Associates, Inc. d/b/a Plus Diagnostics
Represented By: Walter Moreau Berger
Represented By: Jeffrey J Huelskamp
Represented By: William C O'Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Pauluzzi
Represented By: Walter Moreau Berger
Represented By: Jeffrey J Huelskamp
Represented By: William C O'Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?