Brooks v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
| Brooks and Darrell Brooks |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association |
| 4:2015cv00472 |
| February 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order of USCA Judgment; judgment issued as mandate 5/28/2015 re: #9 Notice of Appeal ; USCA No. 15-20244. The appellant failed to timely order transcripts and make financial arrangements with the court reporter, filed.(avleal, 1)
|
| USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505, receipt number HOU053794 re: #9 Notice of Appeal, filed.(pyebernetsky, 4) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Non-Compliance. Appellant has failed to: Pay the notice of appeal filing fee. Submit the DKT13 transcript order form. Parties notified, filed. (avleal, 1) |
| Notice of Assignment of USCA No. 15-20244 re: #9 Notice of Appeal, filed.(melopez, 1) |
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Filing of an Appeal. The following Notice of Appeal and related motions are pending in the District Court: #9 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: Not Paid, filed. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal, #2 Notice of Dismissal, #3 Public Docket sheet) (dahumada, 1) |
| Appeal Review Notes re: #9 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: Not Paid. The appeal filing fee has not been paid, and appellant is a pro se litigant.No hearings were held in the case - no transcripts. Number of DKT-13 Forms expected: 1, filed.(dahumada, 1) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit re: #8 Order of Dismissal by Darrell Brooks (Filing fee $ 505), filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 8 Final DISMISSAL. Brooks's claims against JP Morgan are dismissed with prejudice #4 . Case terminated on 3/30/2015. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
| Filing 7 CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM: Initial conference held. Appearances: Travis Richins. Ct Reporter: F. Warner. The court spoke with Jimmie Brown, an attorney who may be retained by Darrell Brooks. Brown did not enter an appearance. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
|
Filing 6
Order Resetting Conference. At the request of the parties, Initial Conference reset for 3/19/2015 at 10:30 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N. Hughes. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
Order: Initial Conference set for 3/17/2015 at 10:00 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N. Hughes. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/20/2015. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richins, Travis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE in a Removed or Transferred Case (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified.(lgouadi, 4) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co. as Corporate Parent, filed.(Richins, Travis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 61st District Court, Harris County, Texas, case number 2015-07010 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-14464826) filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor by Merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Lewis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
