Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Southern District MANER v. Reproductive Research Technologies, LP et al

MANER v. Reproductive Research Technologies, LP et al

Plaintiff:	WILLIAM MANER
Defendant:	Reproductive Research Technologies, LP, Jack N. McCrary, Robert E Garfield and Rainer Fink
Case Number:	4:2015cv01567
Filed:	June 5, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office:	Houston Office
County:	Harris
Presiding Judge:	Sim Lake
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 504
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 15, 2017	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION denied 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K Johnson) Parties notified.(sjones, 4)
November 4, 2015	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, granting in part and denying in part 10 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) of First Amended Complaint and Motion for Additional Time to File an Answer. (Reproductive Research Technologies, LP's Answer due by 11/18/2015.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 15, 2017

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION denied 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K Johnson) Parties notified.(sjones, 4)

November 4, 2015

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, granting in part and denying in part 10 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) of First Amended Complaint and Motion for Additional Time to File an Answer. (Reproductive Research Technologies, LP's Answer due by 11/18/2015.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MANER v. Reproductive Research Technologies, LP et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MANER
Represented By:	Joshua Estes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reproductive Research Technologies, LP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jack N. McCrary
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Robert E Garfield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Rainer Fink
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?