James Freeman v. Dekker Vacuum Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Freeman
Defendant: Dekker Vacuum Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2015cv01764
Filed: June 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to Compel, 18 MOTION to Compel (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm Smith) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Freeman v. Dekker Vacuum Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Freeman
Represented By: Nicholas Edward Petree
Represented By: Kyle Robert Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dekker Vacuum Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick Nichols Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?