Dialight Corportion v Scott Casey Allen
Plaintiff: Dialight Corporation
Defendant: Scott Casey Allen
Case Number: 4:2015cv03033
Filed: October 15, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 10/14/2015. (eaj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dialight Corportion v Scott Casey Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dialight Corporation
Represented By: Carey A DeWitt
Represented By: James W Henges
Represented By: Paul M Mersino
Represented By: James R Old, Jr
Represented By: Gregory C. Parliman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Casey Allen
Represented By: C. John DeSimone
Represented By: Christopher Edward Howe
Represented By: Kimberly Fahrenbrook Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?