Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP v. Su et al
| Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP |
| Nobu Su, F5 Capital, Hsin Chi Su and Nobuyoshi Morimoto |
| 4:2015cv03760 |
| December 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. § 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Order on Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award. Case terminated on 8/16/2016. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Entry of Default. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Entry of Default against F5 Capital, Nobu Su by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/2/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #8 Letter Rogatory Issued,. (vrios, 2) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Default Judgment against F5 Capital by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/22/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to F5 Capital served on 4/7/2016, answer due 4/28/2016, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Veselka, Larry) |
| ***Delivery Confirmation; delivery date(s) Thu 3/24/2016 10:51 am re: 11 Document(s) Sent, filed. (jdav, 4) |
| Foreign Summons Issued. summons returned to plaintiff by FedEx: (olindor, 4) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion.(Signed by Judge Alfred H. Bennett) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for the Application for the Service of Judicial Documents in the Cayman Islands Pursuant to the Hague Service Convention by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/17/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 8 Letter Rogatory Issued as to Mr. Nobu Su., filed.(cfelchak, 4) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. (Signed by Judge Alfred H. Bennett) Parties notified.(cfelchak, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Amended EXHIBITS re: #4 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed.(Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Hector R. Chavez on behalf of Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. (Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/4/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to F5 Capital, Nobu Su, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation Summons for F5 Capital)(Veselka, Larry) |
| Summons Issued as to F5 Capital, Nobu Su. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by: In person, filed.(bdaniel, 4) |
| Filing 2 **Corrected Entry for Dkt #1 ** MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/21/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) Modified on 1/7/2016 (arrivera, 4). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nobu Su a/k/a Hsin Chi Su a/k/a Nobuyoshi Morimoto and F5 Capital (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-15949884) filed by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Veselka, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
