Schott v. Nobilis Health Corp. et al
| Guenter Schott |
| Nobilis Health Corp., Christopher H. Lloyd and Kenneth J. Klein |
| 4:2016cv00141 |
| January 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The defendants' motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 24), is granted. The dismissal is without prejudice and with leave to amend no later than October 24, 2016. The amended pleading must state with particularit y the material misrepresentations made by the individual defendants (no group pleading), and a basis for scienter beyond the signatures of the SOX certifications.In their motion to dismiss, the defendants request sanctions. (Docket Entry No. 14 at 1 516). They argue that this is plaintiff counsels third complaint. But it is the first complaint that the court has been asked to consider. The dismissal is without prejudice and with leave to amend; the request for sanctions is denied as moot.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER entered GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss ( Responses due by 5/16/2016.)(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
