Schweizer et al v. Canon Inc. et al
||Stephanie Schweizer and United States of America
||Canon Inc., Canon Business Solutions Inc. and Canon USA, Inc.
||January 5, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
|Nature of Suit:
||False Claims Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 16, 2020
ORDER denying 85 Motion for Reconsideration.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|October 9, 2019
ORDER REGARDING 73 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is adopted in part; Plaintiff's Objections are overruled in part; and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. This case is dismissed with prejudice.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|March 29, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, GRANTING 13 First MOTION for Leave to File 2nd Amended Complaint, MOOTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss 5 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. and/or MOTION for Summary Judgment . Having granted the filing of Schweizers SAC, the Court will also consider Canons Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 15, against it, once Schweizer has filed the attachments referenced in the SAC. Schweizer has 14 days from the date of the entry of this order to provide the exhibits listed in the SAC.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?