Guenther et al v. BP Retirement Accumulation Plan et al
Plaintiff: Fredric A Guenther and Walton Fujimoto
Defendant: BP Retirement Accumulation Plan, BP Corporation North America Inc and BP p.l.c.
Case Number: 4:2016cv00995
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 507 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Court finds that the plaintiffs are entitled to equitable relief under Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). The parties are ORDERED to file supplemental briefs regarding the appropriate form of that equitable relief. Each side may file a brief on or before May 1, 2024, and each side may respond to the other sides brief on or before May 15, 2024. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (bkt4)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 273 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 267 Memorandum and Recommendations, granting 191 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Class Certification and Appointment o Class Counsel. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Granting 52 MOTION to Dismiss Counts 1, 2, and 4. The Motion to Dismiss as it pertains to Count 3 is overruled. THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ( Second Amended Complaint due by 4/5/2019., Deft. Responses due by 5/26/2019.)(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER AND OPINION denying 19 Motion to Strike.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guenther et al v. BP Retirement Accumulation Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fredric A Guenther
Represented By: Peter Steilberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walton Fujimoto
Represented By: Peter Steilberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BP Retirement Accumulation Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BP Corporation North America Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BP p.l.c.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?