Gonzaga v. Baker Hughes Inc

Plaintiff: Noel M. Gonzaga
Defendant: Baker Hughes Inc
Case Number: 4:2016cv01702
Filed: June 10, 2016
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Lynn N Hughes
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 10, 2016 19 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION on Judgment. Gonzaga did not follow the administrative process, his claims are time-barred, and he presents no facts to support his claim that the severance release is void. Because of these manifold defects, he will take nothing. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzaga v. Baker Hughes Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noel M. Gonzaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker Hughes Inc
Represented By: Gabrielle S Moses
Represented By: DeAndrea C. Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?