USW Local 13-227 v. Houston Refining, L.P.
Plaintiff: USW Local 13-227
Defendant: Houston Refining, L.P.
Case Number: 4:2016cv02152
Filed: July 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and to Compel Arbitration; denying 11 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment. This case is STAYED pending the completion of arbitration proceedings. Case terminated on December 20, 2017.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USW Local 13-227 v. Houston Refining, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Houston Refining, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USW Local 13-227
Represented By: Patrick M Flynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?