NORRIS v. KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP. U.S.A.
Plaintiff: DORIS D NORRIS
Defendant: KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP. U.S.A.
Case Number: 4:2016cv02424
Filed: August 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: Kawasaki's motions to exclude the expert testimony, (Docket Entries No. 50, 51), are granted in part and denied in part. The motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 49), is denied.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NORRIS v. KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP. U.S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DORIS D NORRIS
Represented By: S. Scott West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP. U.S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?