Hess Corporation v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Plaintiff: Hess Corporation
Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Case Number: 4:2016cv03415
Filed: November 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Sim Lake
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 225 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 212 MOTION FOR RENEWED RULE 52(c) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PARTIAL FINDINGS AS TO THE WELL B(2) VALVE, denying 222 MOTION for Entry of Judgment. (Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses due by 11/19/2020.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 116 Corrected SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment, granting in part and denying in part 117 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment , granting in part and denying in part 118 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, granting 119 Opposed MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony, granting 120 Opposed SEALED MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony, denying without prejudice 121 SEALED MOT ION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dennis Read, denying without prejudice 122 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of David Hirth, denying without prejudice 123 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Peter Koo pmans, denying without prejudice 124 SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Barry Pulliam, denying as moot 125 SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Rolle Hogan (Revised Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/4/2019. Docket Call set for 12/11/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake.)(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(aboyd, 4)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 77 MOTION to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Dennis Read (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
June 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Amended Complaint due by 2/15/2017.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hess Corporation v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hess Corporation
Represented By: Brian Matthew Gillett
Represented By: Thomas W Paterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Represented By: Lucas Thomas Elliot
Represented By: Denise U Scofield
Represented By: Hugh E Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?