Experience Infusion Center, LLC v. Texas Health + Aetna Health Insurance Holding Company, LLC et al
| Experience Infusion Center, LLC |
| Texas Health + Aetna Health Insurance Holding Company, LLC and Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 4:2017cv00034 |
| January 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Anderson |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER entered DENYING 82 First MOTION to Intervene and request for expedited hearing.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment .(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER entered: The motion to extend the time to seek leave to amend, (Docket Entry No. 44), is granted. Experience Infusion must file its amended complaint by December 8, 2017. The motion for leave to file the third amended complaint, (Docket Entry No. 31), is denied as moot. Experience Infusion also recently responded opposing Lisa White Watkinss motion to intervene. (Docket Entry No. 47). Because the court already granted Watkins's motion to intervene, (see Docket Entry No. 36), Experience Infusions response need not be addressed.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
