Gilbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
| Gerald E. Gilbert |
| Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, James W. Mossbarger, Bobby Pervis, Fisher, Justin B. Waterson, Carla Joseph, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Julie A. Ward, Tawana Smith, Paul Strunk, Glenda Adams, Steven Smock, Erin Freem and Jovita Glanville |
| 4:2017cv00299 |
| January 30, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Polk |
| Melinda Harmon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Entries 4, 7] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice as legally frivolous. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 2 and Motio n for a Preliminary Injunction 3 are DENIED. All other pending motions, if any, are DENIED. This dismissal counts as a STRIKE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties. The Clerk will also provide a copy by e-mail to the District Clerk for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Attention: Manager of the Three-Strikes List, at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
