Sitco Enterprises, LLC v. Tervita Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Sitco Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: Tervita Corporation, Tervita LLC, Republic Services Corporation and Republic Services, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2017cv00685
Filed: March 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Fort Bend
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: The motions for summary judgment, (Docket Entries No. 31, 35), are granted in part and denied in part. The remaining issue about which there is a factual dispute is whether the minimum-billing requirement appl ied; summary judgment is denied as to that issue. Neither party moved for summary judgment on Tervita's counterclaims for fraud and fraudulent inducement; those claims also remain. The motion to strike the cross-motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 36), is denied as moot. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: The motions for summary judgment, (Docket Entries No. 31, 35), are granted in part and denied in part. The remaining issue about which there is a factual dispute is whether the minimum-billing requirement applied; summ ary judgment is denied as to that issue. Neither party moved for summary judgment on Tervita's counterclaims for fraud and fraudulent inducement; those claims also remain. The motion to strike the cross-motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 36), is denied as moot. A pretrial conference to address the remaining work is set for June 18, 2018, at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 11-D.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sitco Enterprises, LLC v. Tervita Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sitco Enterprises, LLC
Represented By: Thomas M Fulkerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tervita Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tervita LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Republic Services Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Republic Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?