Lopez et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Genaro Lopez and Mary R Lopez |
| Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Santander Bank, N.A., Anna Stewart, David Barry, Byron Stewart, Keith Wolfshohl, Helen Henderson, David Stiles, Patricia Poston, Shonia Shaw, Cole D. Patton and Denny Tedrow |
| 4:2017cv00697 |
| March 5, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Melinda Harmon |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 37 Memorandum and Recommendations, 27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Defendants' 27 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER; denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot without prejudice to reurging a similar motion against the FAC.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss, all claims against the Substitute Trustees are DISMISSED without prejudice..(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
