Boltex Manufacturing Company, L.P. et al v. Ulma Piping USA Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Boltex Manufacturing Company, L.P. and Weldbend Corporation
Defendant: Ulma Piping USA Corp. and Ulma Forja, S. Coop
Case Number: 4:2017cv01400
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 365 ORDER ON PERMANENT INJUNCTION(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 337 ORDER. The Court enters an interlocutory order in favor of Plaintiffs as a precursor to entering final judgment. Each Plaintiff will file a bill of costs if seeking recovery of costs by 11/15/2019; Defendants may respond by 11/27/2019. The Court gr ants permanent injunction and will address that in a separate order. Plaintiffs are ordered to provide the Court with its proposed injunctive language by 11/15/2019; Defendants may respond by 11/27/2019.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 228 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court grants 208 summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff as to Defendants' counterclaims on traceability. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER regarding 99 100 Motion to Exclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Thomas Varner. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 76 Memorandum and Recommendations, Paragraph 37 of Defendants' counterclaim is STRICKEN. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boltex Manufacturing Company, L.P. et al v. Ulma Piping USA Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boltex Manufacturing Company, L.P.
Represented By: Katharyn Ann Albright Grant
Represented By: Saul H Perloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Weldbend Corporation
Represented By: Katharyn Ann Albright Grant
Represented By: Saul H Perloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ulma Piping USA Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ulma Forja, S. Coop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?