Wild v. Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc.
| Wild and Alexander Wild |
| Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc. |
| 4:2017cv01406 |
| May 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Travis |
| Ewing Werlein |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 504 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 05/31/2017. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (marflores, 4)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc. by Alexander Wild, filed. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 4 Register of Copyrights, AO-121, Notified. (TraceyConradadi, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/25/2017 at 04:30 PM in Room 11521 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(TraceyConradadi, 4)
|
| Summons Issued as to Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(gkelner, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc., filed.(Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cypress Creek Pest Control, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-18321705) filed by Alexander Wild. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Higbee, Mathew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
