Garcia et al v. Peterson et al
| Jose Garcia, Mark Wilburn, Jose Luis Vazquez, Jose Caballero, Americo Fuentez, Franciso Martinez-Villarreal, Jose Mejia, Kenneth Powell, Rosa Ramirez, Alex Santos, Dulce Santos, James Stephens, Aaron Dunning, Albert Foks and Gabriel Strasser |
| Vasilia Peterson, Robert Peterson, Ormando Gomez, All My Sons of Denton County, Inc., Graebel Van Lines Holdings, LLC, Graebel Van Lines, LLC, Graebel/Houston Movers, LLC, Graebel Moving and Warehouse Corp., Graebel/North Carolina Movers, LLC, MidCap Financial, LLC and John Does 1-10 |
| 4:2017cv01601 |
| May 25, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Gray H Miller |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
299
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 216 SEALED MOTION to Strike and Objections to Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Evidence, GRANTING 173 MOTION for Summary Judgment ; Terminating 221 MOTION to Certify Class, Terminating 229 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
293
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 242 MOTION to Decertify Class. The opt-in plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
292
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 230 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Graebel defendants (joined by MidCap). (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
291
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: 192 Application for attorneys' fees. In light of the discussion above, the court RECONSIDERS its award of attorneys' fees for a portion of the fees incurred relating to the motion to dismiss. No fees wi ll be awarded for the motion to dismiss. However, the court finds the fees requested relating to the motion for sanctions reasonable, and the entire fee request related to filing the motion for sanctions is GRANTED. The court AWARDS the plaintiffs $21,427.50 in fees associated with the motion for sanctions.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 129 MOTION for Sanctions, GRANTING 147 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply in Support of Response to Motion for Sanctions. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
116
ORDER DENYING 108 Opposed MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Designation (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 56 MOTION to Certify Class (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART 41 MOTION to Dismiss, 42 Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Filing
59
ORDER Denying as moot 33 Motion for Discovery; Granting 49 Motion for Discovery. The court further instructs the parties to meet and confer in light of this order and submit a joint scheduling order on or before November 17, 2017. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.